Gonzaga, Grams. C., Haselton, Meters. G., Smurda, J., Davies, Yards. S., & Poore, J. C. (2008). Advancement and People Conclusion, 29(2), 119–126.
Hazan, C., & Diamond, L. Meters. (2000). The place out of accessory in people mating. Article on Standard Therapy, 4(2), 186–204.
Kraut, Roentgen., Kiesler, S., Boneva, B., Cummings, J., Helgeson, V., & Crawford, A good. (2002). Sites paradox revisited. Diary off Personal Affairs, 58(1), 49–74.
Kraut, Roentgen., Patterson, M., Lundmark, V., Kiesler, S., Mukophadhyay, T., & Scherlis, W. (1998). Websites contradiction: A social technology you to definitely decreases personal engagement and you may mental really-becoming? Western Psychologist, 53(9), 1017–1031.
Kreider, R.M., & Sphere, J. M. (2001). Count, timing, and you will lifetime of marriages and divorces. Latest Populace Records, 70-80, (Arizona, DC: U.S. Census Agency, 2005).
Lemieux, Roentgen., & Hale, J. L. (2002). Cross-sectional studies out of closeness, hobbies, and you can connection: Comparison the fresh presumptions of one’s triangular idea of love. Mental Profile, 90(3,Pt1), 1009-1014. doi:/PR0.90.step 3.1009-1014
Lockwood, P., Dolderman, D., Sadler, P., & Gerchak, Age. (2004). Impression best throughout the carrying out tough: Societal reviews in this intimate relationship. Record away from Identification and you can Social Psychology, 87(1), 80–95.
Maner, J. K., Miller, S. L., Rouby, D. A beneficial., & Gailliot, Meters. T. (2009). Intrasexual vigilance: The implicit knowledge from close rivalry. Diary from Identification and you may Social Psychology, 97(1), 74–87.
A great. (2001)mitment and you may relationship restoration elements
Maner, J. K., Rouby, D. An effective., & Gonzaga, Grams. C. (2008). Automated inattention in order to glamorous selection: The fresh new evolved mindset out-of matchmaking repairs. Development and you will Individual Conclusion, 29(5), 343–349.
pold, B. Age. (1981). Sequential study out of conflict and you may agreement into the disturb and you can nondistressed marital lovers. Diary out-of Consulting and you may Systematic Mindset, 49(4), 554–567.
McKenna, K. Y. Good., Environmentally friendly, A. S., Gleason, Meters. J. (2002). Dating creation on line: What is the larger destination? Diary off Societal Issues, 58(1), 9–29.
The many benefits of positive illusions: Idealization as well as the construction from satisfaction within the intimate matchmaking
Neff, L. Good., & Karney, B. Roentgen. (2002). Self-assessment aim in the intimate relationships: A type of international improvement and certain confirmation. During the P. Noller & J. Good. Feeney (Eds.), Wisdom ents in the study of few telecommunications (pp. 32–58). Ny, NY: Cambridge University Drive.
Obegi, J. H. (2008). The introduction of the customer-specialist bond from contact lens away from attachment concept. Psychotherapy: Concept, Research, Routine, Degree, 45(4), 431-446. doi:/a0014330
Pickett, C. L., & Gardner, W. L. (2005). The latest public overseeing program: Improved susceptibility to social cues due to the fact a transformative response to public exception to this rule. In the K. D. Williams, J. P. Forgas, & W. von Hippel (Eds.), The latest public outcast: Ostracism, social different, getting rejected, and you may bullying (pp. 213–226). New york, NY: Mindset Press.
Pierce, T., & Lydon, J. E. (2001). Around the globe and you can particular relational models in the exposure to personal relationships. Log off Character and you may Societal Mindset, 80(4), 613–631.
Rholes, W. S., Simpson, J. An effective., Tran, S., ). Connection and you may recommendations trying to within the close relationship. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 33(3), 422–438.
Ross, L. Roentgen., & Spinner, B. (2001). General and you can particular attachment representations within the adulthood: Is there a relationship?. Diary Out of Personal And personal Relationships, 18(6), 747-766. doi:407501186001
Rusbult, C. E., Olsen, Letter., Davis, J. L., & Hannon, P. Into the J. Harvey & An excellent. Wenzel (Eds.), Romantic romantic relationships: Repair and you will enhancement (pp. 87–113). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
Schul, Y., & Vinokur, An effective. D. (2000). Projection privately effect certainly one of partners due to the fact a purpose of the fresh similarity inside their shared event. Character And Societal Mindset Bulletin, 26(8), 987-1001. doi:1672002610008
Seligman, C., Fazio, Roentgen. H., & Zanna, M. P. (1980). Outcomes of salience out-of extrinsic advantages into preference and you can enjoying. Diary regarding Character and you may Social Mindset, 38(3), 453–460.
| Location | Love, notice, therefore the inhibition of advice of close options, |
| Client | |
| Consultants | Photography: |
| Consultant Az: | |
| Curator: | |
| Square meters |